ALL ABOUT THE MUSIC -- the Other Half of the Songwriting Coin

ALL ABOUT THE MUSIC -- the Other Half of the Songwriting Coin

Welcome to the All About the Music thread, where you will find discussions ranging from songwriting process and musical influences to detailed posts about time signatures, chord progressions, and key changes. And anything in between.

This thread began when I was feeling more than a little lonely here on DCO, thinking I was the only music nerd out there who wanted to discuss all that technical stuff that seems so mysterious to so many fans about David's music. At which point I realized that there was, oddly enough, no thread in which to do that.

Any topic of discussion that relates to the music is welcome here, including that about other band members and their musical contributions to the recordings and/or performances, past, present, and future. Lyrical discussions are welcome as well, as long as, again, they relate to the music. (For more detailed lyrical analysis, I direct you to our sister thread, All About the Lyrics. Our other sister thread, All About the Voice, is also available for discussions about David's vocal instrument -- although cross-posting here from the latter thread is not frowned on, either.) And any question, however simple, is welcome. I don't think anyone claims to be an expert here; certainly not me -- but I think we can all learn from each other about what it is about David's music that fascinates, and entertains, and affects us all.

***********************************
Resources
The various resources provided below are a compilation of the many informative links that have been provided by the denizens of this thread, as well as several informative blogs compiled by said denizens and other DCO members. If you find anything incorrect, or if credit must be given to an otherwise uncredited contribution, please post in this thread or PM me and I will make the necessary changes. Also, any further contributions to this list of resources are not only accepted but encouraged. Thank you to all who have done so already. This list could not have become nearly as comprehensive without the devoted assistance of many.
***********************************

Musical Execution

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

***********************************

David Cook Discography, Sheet Music, Lyrics, Chords, and More

    Discography and Libraries
  • David Cook Unofficial Discography by QTTaquito provides all known credits to all known songs DC has written
  • David Cook Unofficial Discography by Cowriter by QTTaquito (the companion discography to the one above)
  • TLM Discography by FoolsApril64: a list of all songs on TLM, along with all other songs and known collaborations written in advance of that album, as well as all known writing and performance credits.
  • Album Writing Credits for DCTR, including non-DC-written songs, by BethRiot
  • Pre-Idol Video Library, compiled by LadyBirdSF, contains links to videos of all DC's pre-Idol music, from Axium to Analog Heart to those unpublished songs we actually know of.
  • Axium Resource on LiveJournal, contains information on the band's history, as well as a discography and links to download various songs.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

***********************************

On songwriting, recording, and production

    Songwriting
  • Youtube video some smart aleck posted about his songwriting process (by Mitch Friedman)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    David About the Music: Comprehensive musical interviews and playlists (Thanks, David! We love this! Keep it up!)
  • The Musical Interview Archive contains links to all articles containing pertinent musical information.
  • David Cook -- Musical Likes and Influences -- A comprehensive list of songs that David has mentioned in various interviews or other media, compiled by G*Marie; an excellent resource, including the additional songs appended in the comments.

And, per request, Because at the end, it really is all about the music -- an open letter -- my blog post, which I hope DC reads at some point, informing him that while we'd love to talk about the music, we'd appreciate any nuggets of information he'd consider throwing our way as he sees fit.

Comments (2263)

Cardinal sin here of not reading back all of the posts, but the current discussion is just too interesting to me to not chip in.

a) He talks in some interview about the ambivalence of Avalanche. Give me a few minutes and I'll try to find it. Might have been in Manila

b) I don't think Dave will ever write a straightforward love song. Because he knows love is complex. As is he.

Side note: I don't see a link to the ABC Newsradio interview from around the album release in the OP. IIRC he also talked about his creative process there. Will check and report back

--
Innocuous comments like that are how it starts. Then a year later your soul and free will are in a box in Cook's basement. (tm Wheeziev)

Fascinating thread! I found this just yesterday and have read only last three paiges and learned more than I could imagine. I`ve been fascinated of The Voice since the beginning of AI7. Now after reading your insightful analysis of David`s unique voice I want to know even more! .... This is just great! Thank you, cimorene for starting this thread!
I`ll keep reading, have to start from the beginning!

--
Sophisticated and Sensual David - Live Performances: VIDEO LIBRARIES 1 & 2

Regarding Avalanche, I always saw it as a love song that was actually ambivalent, but only if you got down to it and analyzed the lyrics. The melody, though -- it's sweet, almost a lullaby. Again we see the dichotomy.

exactamente, cimorene. thus my comment re wanting to hear an acoustic version. there is a lot of plaintiveness in there, or could be, depending on the interp. you get a female singer in there with a good guitar part? i think it could be a very cool piece of work. maybe a little slower. a little softer. a little less hawt and a little more vulnerable. (shoot, dave himself could do it that way.... it's all IN the music already.... you listen to how he sings the 3rd repeat of the chorus, at 2:54 and following on DCTR, how he flips into head voice momentarily on the word "can't" of "can't remember...." gah. It's way cool, all the terror and the longing of that song is right there, in that moment. But it passes quickly and the character.... whoever it is... puts the armor back on fast, or at least the desperate loudness of the more conventional delivery....)

and yeah, Queen, it's all love songs of one sort or another, DCTR is. But none of the boy/girl ones are peaceful, kwim? Maybe he'll never write one like that; maybe it's just not his taste, regardless of what happens to him IRL. I think he appreciates the difficulty of writing something that's not mawkish. However, difficult is not "impossible." No way of knowing what might happen, should he decide that trustworthy romantic love is something he'd like to address, musically. Time alone will tell (she intones....)

--
I laugh at myself while the tears roll down....

I am definitely not a musician or lyricist, but for me, Avalanche is a love song....it just always was, from the first time it graced my ears......it seems like it is more of a new love, whereas Heroes is much more upbeat and seems more permanent......but Avalanche, wow, that for me is also a love song....yes, there is some uncertainty, etc., but the raw emotion......OMG!

--
karen "would you sing my song at the top of your lungs..."

Adding a post to mention, now that I've had time to ruminate about the love song discussion...

I don't know if anything DC writes will ever fall into the straight-out "love song" box. It's a characteristic of so much of his newer music (i.e., AH onward) that the themes are multifaceted, and interesting, and aren't just "you're awesome and I love you." I don't think we'll ever get our own version of Crush, for instance. Or if we do, it'll be angsty as anything we've seen.

What I do think is that the poetry will probably mirror this. Or this. Because metaphor aside, DC does have a tendency in his lyrics to see through to the realism of a situation in spite of the romantic haze... and maybe, when he does write that elusive love song, we'll recognize that poetry and music don't have to be completely unambivalent to be perfectly romantic.

As I've said before on other parts here, mainly dwop, I'm not good with lyrics and interpretation. I more take how a song makes me feel and interpret it that way than to look deeply into the lyrics. That said, I love it when everyone else brings that skill to the table and can enlighten me so thank you. So my meager offerings to the current subject are these: Although David has not written a love song per se he did say that the theme of the record is love amidst distance and also in another interview said something like all the songs he's written basically have something to do with a girl. So taking that into consideration aren't they all love songs on some level even if they are not really the "wedding song first dance" level of obvious love in the lyrics?

Also, I don't know that we ever found out for sure that David did not write the lyrics to Avalanche. I don't recall hearing anything like that.

Welcome, Swanny. We'll be happy to have your input whenever you do decide to venture out of lurkerdom.

Regarding Avalanche, I always saw it as a love song that was actually ambivalent, but only if you got down to it and analyzed the lyrics. The melody, though -- it's sweet, almost a lullaby. Again we see the dichotomy.

Seamom, Incipit -- You may be both right. It might just be a general impression from 90's music. 'Cause Red Hot was a complete channeling of Metallica, but later Axium is definitely influenced by Vedder. I also remember thinking Creed was a little similar, too, but they're a more modern band and have likely just been influenced by the same bands as DC. Or I could just be blanking on someone specific. It'll come to me in a couple of weeks at 3am, probably.

As for the PB board, well, lots of the usual suspects from there have hopped over to hang out, here, which is a lovely thing to see -- this thread was kind of born there, or at least its inklings. But I'm happy to see other names that I don't recognize, or not from the PB, on this thread, too. And while pinning does take a while to get done -- we are in consideration, folks, I asked, but don't necessarily expect to hear anything until Labor Day -- I do want to remark on the milestone we hit today. 4 weeks and over 400 posts. I'm channeling CJT here, but that's an average of 100 posts/week and it's been pretty consistent. Thank you to all who have contributed their insightful comments. I've been having a blast reading every one of them.

And on a lighthearted note -- the background music in the latest Pork Beans was from The Last of the Mohicans. What are the odds we can find out who possesses that soundtrack on their iPod from the possible culprits?

Squirrellygirl (not verified):

Answer your question from way down this thread:

"seamom:
Squirrelly, I'm impressed! An F above high C? Were you trained in opera? You must have had years of training along with a God-given talent."

No, at that time I had very little training except for the teachers at school. I was able to sing along with the opera singers on the records that my brother brought home for me...I tried and was able to hit all the notes. (Not anymore, though.) I was offered training by an opera singer who visited our school, but I didn't take her up on it. I was living by myself when I was 17, and going to school, and working and didn't have my mind on being an opera singer. I missed a bunch of opportunities back then, I guess. They didn't have American Idol back then, and with the conditions I was born in, I might as well have been born in excrement. My mom made me attend all of my brother's piano recitals (very long and boring, but I did need to be there for him). I absolutely received no encouragement from my family (except my brother bringing home opera records). My mom never attended (to my memory) any of my concerts that I was allowed to sing solos for, including when I was in high school. At one time, they even got elementary school kids to back me up on Carpenter's "Sing, Sing a Song" -- I remember the feeling of "here I am up here singing a solo, and no one in my family is even in the audience". Strange family I had. I eventually quit singing in school programs.

Can't live in the past, though. I'm more supportive of my daughter, and she never had to deal with that problem.

--
Squirrellygirl

canadadc fan - just a quick comment before I get to all of your post - "edge of the bed" was me. (big smile and blush).

eta: ( thanks, min, for the def. Now I will use it to death): Also, CDCF: interesting point about David's musical themes, lyrical themes and theatre. In classical pieces ( meaning, as well. music of the Romantic Era), a musical theme that carries through a piece and is built upon is called a "leitmotif." Think of Prokofiev's "Peter and The Wolf" theme that carries through the piece in variations througout different movements. Song stories are very theatrical and absorbing and provide a well-rounded experience.

It has been noted and explicated in many different threads that DCTR could even be seen as a rock opera, which would explain the musical and thematic trends we see.

This is an amazing thread and I nominate it to be pinned under CJT. Thank you for starting it Cimorene.

I can't talk music, I feel it but can't describe it, but as I read all your posts, I find myself learning, understanding, nodding and mostly enjoying every one of them. I've been checking this thread out even before CJT and DWoP, as if I had nothing else to do!

YaminaC, who knew yaks were so musically... something, don't know what... brilliant?

MsDarcy, your Pemanent description was beautiful, I just had to listen to it again, and you are so right!

Anyway, carry on music people, I'll be lurking around.

--
Ding!

Yup, Yamina, i think it is "whole again." Which does make it somewhat more upbeat.

But it is not a confident song, IMO. The singer (whoever wrote it) is looking for reassurance even in the middle of the sexual act, kwim? He's barely on the edge of consciousness, you know, at the point right before words become totally superfluous. And yet.... "tell me tonight, all that we have been, was it nothing more than the noise inside my head?"

that, to me, is the expression of someone who is delighted by the sex and also... scared to death. "Can't remember ever falling this hard." All that stuff re falling, crushing, crashing.... this is something that might be wonderful, cause ravishment can be wonderful. But also moving at an uncontrollable pace, and potentially very dangerous, in the mindset of whoever's expressing these words. Compare this with the imagery of "Heroes," where the love is trustworthy, and lifts the singer up ("not gonna come down off of these clouds.... teach me to rise up, open my eyes up... you're still standing."). It is not the same stuff, by a long shot.

But, you know. Observations on themes are one thing -- these are obvious to anybody who takes the time to attend to what's there in the work, encompassing the lyrics, music, arrangements and performance. Musings on why those are the selected themes? That's the material of the PB thread, lol, where the unsubstantiated meets the wildly speculative. (Minstrel is allowed to say this, being the chief culprit. Snerk.)

--
I laugh at myself while the tears roll down....

AngelaT - are you kidding me? Do I need to completely rethink this song? *hangs head in shame* guess I should have checked the lyrics link - Day-um.

YaminaC : ETA: Taylor_Sue - I forgot about Avalanche, although I venture to say even this is not a "traditional" love song - love the surprise of "all at once I am alone again" - despite the passion, a separation still exists.
Wait, what? I thought both iterations of the phrase were ' All at once I am whole again'?

yaminac
These arrangements, where the listener is taken from point A to point B to point C, seem so rare compared to the repetitive riff-based songs which are so popular right now. Its a big reason I feel so passionate about David's music - his arrangements are like mini dramas

I completely agree with this point. This is what I love about so much of David's music and also in his lyrics. I hear it in so many songs even from back in his Axium days. Where I see it quite cleary in his current music is in KOTN... where it starts out with "I can say, you were lost when you walked into the room.. we can win you over, with just a kiss on the neck and moves through the story until it is "You can say, I was lost when I walked into the room....You can win me over with just a kiss on the neck".

I am not musically knowledgeable but writing, storytelling, lyrics, peformance is what I know and love. And David's lyrics have always fascinated me. I have considered that perhaps his background in musical theatre and the "storytelling" that takes place in musical theatre songs may have helped him with this aspect of his writing. He would have developed an ear for the way the storyline progresses in a song, and how many musicals use the same "music" as the core of many songs in the show.Many times the song is just arranged differently or in a lot of cases the songs/lyrics change over time in the show to reflect the "progression" of the story line.

p.s. capt cha I've had enough of you today! GMFWC to you too!

I also want to comment on the "love song" topic: I had noticed this myself recently, as I have been a bit obsessed with some of David's most sensual or "romantic" performances like "Lie" and ever obsessed with Permanent and Anodyne as each of these is such a strong emotional performance. I started to realize there are no songs where David actually says "I love you" etc...And actually spent some time last week going through his songs and lyrics to determine if I was accurate. We know that Permanent is his lullaby/love song to Adam and he juxtaposed the concepts of temporary and permanent with each other to show he "will always be there" for his brother.

With regard to Lie, someone (here or on DWOP, not sure) gave a great description of Lie very recently as an "edge of the bed" talk (wow such a great image). I actually see Andy's "Better Day" as the companion piece to Lie. It's the perspective of "the other person" who has some secrets to share but is choosing not to, for the time being, to keep the relationship alive.

I tend to agree with minstrel et al (citation geek moment to reflect that others have also expressed this point but not lising all their names ) in the idea that David will write a love song when he is experiencing it. Piece of Mind and Still are certainly in that direction, and as for Avalanche Taylor Sue I do see it as a romantic song, but David was not the sole writer for the lyrics (to my knowledge) and so for me it doesn't have the same power of a love song when it isn't perhaps written out of his own experience (which is my assumption). David says he writes universal themes and writes what he knows (like any good writer) and the day will come when he will write a "permanent like" ode to his love and we'll all be wishing it was us!!

I just want to say how much I love this thread (said it before, keep on saying it). I love the positive discussions about David's music, lyrics, talent. and feel like I am learning so much from everyone here. And for the fact that I actually have somewhere to discuss all this important David stuff cos no one at home wants to hear it !!

With just a kiss on the neck

Taylor_Sue: Avalanche is a love song "of a kind." But, as min commented, it's full of his existential and emotional misgivings and fears : " was it nothing more than noise inside our heads?" It is lusty and hot and full of grief and doubt.
Vocally, he shows us that because he sings both full throttle and soft and delicate to bring out all the dimensions.

And, following minstrel's train of thought, I don't think David will write a purely joyful love song until it is an authentic experience he is having AND he wants to share it with the world. Not every song writer is that concerned about exposing that. I remember an early interview after The Win, when he was asked if he ever sang a love song directly to a girl and he was emphatically, No. (was that the interview when he mentioned how freaked he was by the fan's comments about what he does to her when she is listening to him alone in her room, and he gave that raised eyebrow into the camera? )

Many songwriters can write from the general lexicon of emotion without it being personal. Singer/songwriters tend to be personal in their expression, even if they put that personal stuff through several filters so as to make their references a bit more ambiguous.

OK - you all are getting into that PB world and I told you - I'm too shallow!

I think, in part, the choices to release LO and CBTM as the first singles reflect RCA's attempt to capitalize on the appeal of both the "primal scream" and the "romantic" Dave. Yet, some of us feel as though the full appeal of Dave has yet to be revealed to the world. Not only has the selection of these singles discounted Dave's ability as a songwriter, but the actual compositions themselves are not particularly interesting - both, despite David's attempts to vary the vocal nuances through volume and color, pretty much maintain the same emotional palate all the way through on the recordings. A bit surprising, considering his musical selections on Idol were so imaginative. I am so, so curious to see RCA's next single choice (inevitably Dave's songwriting at last) and its reception with the general audience at large. Will it "wow" the world or will most people be unable to appreciate the fullness of the remaining works?

Re "love songs" - just my personal taste, but a HUGE appeal for me is that the lyrics on DCTR, AH and even THH and MWK focus on aspects of various relationships OTHER than traditional romance of the pure "I love you" or "You left me - I'm killing myself!"

ETA: Taylor_Sue - I forgot about Avalanche, although I venture to say even this is not a "traditional" love song - love the surprise of "all at once I am alone again" - despite the passion, a separation still exists.

Minstrel,

Do you not consider Avalanche to be a love song? Maybe I'm interpreting it wrong. I don't see much else it could be.

And perhaps Andy is able to easily write love songs because he is in love with a wonderful girl? And maybe hasn't been through the wringer the way David has? (I'm assuming both that David has and that Andy hasn't.)

lovethemusic - I hear yah, but someday , through his own growth and life experience, an "I love you" song may develop. It may take a while, but even Dylan sings "I love you."

And, LTM, very good points about this journey towards the next body of work. I can't wait for "the shock." I have never felt so "impatient" with any artist before to see what is coming next. With David, I just want to see/hear more, more, more because I anticipate another journey of discovery.

killed inadvertent double post

JLG, so funny.... we were writing the same thoughts at about the same time. Crazy.

As to whether D's love songs would be cheesy? Maybe if he tried now, they would be. Some folks have to feel it to write it, kwim? When the time comes, he'll be able to do it. ("Peace of Mind"' is not cheesy. Neither is "Still.") But if you try to force it when it's not really something you're burning to write about? Then maybe, yeah, that's hard. Sara Bareilles certainly thinks so... "(I'm Not Gonna Write You A) Love Song" is about that very subject... her response to management's request that one should be written.

But it's interesting that D's also not chosen to cover anybody ELSE's love songs.

It is not that he would be incapable of slaying us, with these things. It's that .... this is not what currently interests him, apparently. Musically or existentially. He's working other themes, kwim? (And considering all he's discovered re the effectiveness of "naked in church?" I do not expect him to be in a big rush to go there, for a while, regarding the forever&ever type of love. Lust, ecstasy, obsession, betrayal, dishonesty, abandonment, loss... he's all over that stuff. The other, not so much... other than the steadfast love you get from your friends/family.)

But, no worries. When the time comes? My money's on his ability to deliver the goods. (Andy, OTOH, is capable of writing quite effective, sincere love songs and is more interested in doing it... "Better Day," "Don't Give Up on Us" and "Forever," from the THH EP, for example.... but his style's his own, and pretty different from the songwriting done by both David and Neal.)

eta (which means, edited to add)... lovethemusic... i think people could definitely cover dave's material. they would not sound like dave. it would be better not to try. but if it's strong material? there is no reason why someone else might not want to try it. D would make some cash, that way. And... he is sui generis, but he is not the only artist in the world with interpretive talent. "Lie" would be a strong piece of work in anybody's hands; Nick Gibson's version was pretty effective, in the country mode, for instance. "CBTM" could be sung by any number of people. "Avalanche" ditto (acoustic, that could be really cool, I think). "The Truth." He's written a ton of good stuff, and it would be less than a compliment to him, to presume that only he can sing it. But it would take someone smart enough not to try to be a daveClone. Actually... to hear a female artist do some of this, would be very cool, because that would circumvent the problem, to a degree.

--
I laugh at myself while the tears roll down....

Sorry to post a second time but I just read jayelgee1's post. David said in an interview that if he wrote love songs they would be real cheesy and we would laugh. I inferred that we would not be getting any romatic-I love you songs soon. He said this all in a laughing mode but remember that he doesn't take himself seriously but he does his music. The PB thread goes well with this thread because of the emotional connection and psyche involved with the production and performance of his music. I will shut up now.
--
"I try really hard not to put people into boxes" David Cook

Thanks to everyone who spends time telling the rest of us ,who know very little technically about music, what we are experiencing. My initial draw to David on Idol was because I could understand the lyrics. As the season went on, I found that his tone, emotion, and word emphasis made each song more interesting. When I found Analog Heart I couldn't believe that I got all this along with an emotional journey from his own work. His music makes me feel that I can almost look into his soul (Permanent, Lie, Life on the Moon, ADAM).

He mentioned that when they put out the next record it will be different (progression). I don't think it will be a shock because of what has been happening during the tour. I noticed a change in how the songs are done, the emotion and the arrangements of the songs from my first concert in Feb. to the last one in July. I feel like he has been taking us through his personal musical progression and by the time the second record is out we will be there with him. I can't get tired of hearing the songs live because he never conveys the song the same way twice. I have taped three concerts on an mp3 voice recorder which takes out a lot of the background noise. I can hear so many little differences in endings, holding of a phrase or changes in small musical parts. His success with covers on Idol and in concert comes from his gift of telling a story, releasing his passion, and his unique voice quality.

Thanks for helping me see that something that seems so effortless is so complex. What are some thoughts on others trying to cover (wow moments) David's songs?

--
"I try really hard not to put people into boxes" David Cook

YAK - another thought I was having this morning as I drove to work with David, as usual, blasting from the car stereo, is his appeal as a "romantic singer." And I was comparing this "flavor" of David to other male singers who can also belt it out in raw emotion at intense levels, or growl as he does etc. But not all of them can play the "romantic lead."

For example : You will never ever hear Mick Jagger sing romantically. Bono sings love songs in his own way, but never romantically. I'm no expert, but I'm sure Cobain is not in that category. (I need some of you 20 and 30 somethings to fill this in for me). I don't think Daughtry can do it. Chris Martin does not impress me much as a singer ( I know, I know, what is wrong with me , huh?)

It is a particular ability AND part of the persona. And while we have never ever heard any of David's lyrics state right out " I love you.," he sings of love and the hurts attendant. I don't think we have directly addressed this aspect of the music, his lyrics, his "persona" and how his incredible vocal and emotional agility allows for this.

As I thought about this, I wondered if on album #2 ( counting from DCTR), David and Neal will consciously set out to write any soft / romantic songs. It will be interesting to see.

ETA ( does that mean "edit"? ) : Min - didn't see your post when I threw this up, but I think it ties together to the elements you write about.

Yes, re the arrangements. This is why I don't like stuff too glossy (a la some of DCTR) and why I much prefer what I've seen from the tewer, in terms of the evolution of the material, live.

Cases in point.... the beautiful nuances of the acoustic LOTM (Sirius) and Mr. Sensitive (recent radio appearance).... this is not just making lemonade out of the "lemon" of not having the whole band available... this is making champagne out of it.

Dave's been messing with arrangments for a good bit, though.... when you look at what he did on AH vs the early Axium things, there is no comparison. The raw talent was always there, but he's learned a lot about not only how to exploit his vocal gift but also how to arrange material in a more subtle way, for a more varied emotional impact. (Rather than a sort of one-note "i'm mad, i'm hurt, etc")

I find it fun to look at the arc, for instance, in the way "Truth is a Gun" is arranged (Alive in Tulsa @ the Venue) .... with that percussive guitar driving the whole opening statement.... It's like firing bullets, frankly... underneath D's rant. But then it's pulled way back at 2:02 so it's mostly acapella, with just these little guitar stings before the insistent riff takes over again. This provides a great sense of pent-up energy. In the end it just becomes full-blown rant, supported by guitar and drums. (And to me, it's sort of a ..... boring song, and I think it's testimony to the power of the arrangement, that I still find it fairly interesting to listen to.) .... also just as an aside... the Blindsided version of this is in a higher key than the live version. (no one shd be surprised by this, by now.)

Now, if you listen to "Porcelain," you can hear some of the same arranging tactics at work, in terms of how the percussiveness of the bass and guitar drive the material forward. Here, though, there's a much more interesting (to me) contrast between the fundamentally lyrical treatment of the voice part (esp in the choruses, where he is also harmonizing w/himself) vs the often-staccato treatment in the instrumental parts. At 2:18 the whole thing almost comes to a halt where it goes off into a sort of dreamy guitar solo.... so you get the idea that maybe the singer is calming down a little. But it's just a tease, because at 2:39 the drums start to build, the guitar gets more screechy and insistent (and distorted), there's an impending sense of chaos until the chorus part returns in this huge dramatic statement. And the whole thing ends on a high, wailed repetition ("a heart of glass") and an unresolved chord.

As incipit noted below... D's gotten quite good at explicating, musically, the theme of obsession (i.e. the kind of love that is unhealthy but hard to let go). DIYA, to me, is just another iteration of that theme.... and it is fascinating how D did NOT write that material, but selected it and has messed around with it until it becomes something that is all-of-a-piece with "Porcelain."

What he'd do with a song about real love, between a guy and a girl, ya gotta wonder, huh? It's been a very long time since "Peace of Mind." (Though "Permanent" might provide some clues, because certainly that is about real love, also.)

--
I laugh at myself while the tears roll down....

The quality I love most about Dave's "primal scream" is that the actual note is clear as a bell. Its more of a belt straight from the gut. I like jayelgee''s description: reaches deep in, takes that breath and lets go with those gut wrenching peak notes. There's more beauty to the tone than the word "scream" conveys. This is what I think of when one says primal scream

cimorene - Your thoughts about the "heresy" someday of covers of David's songs reminds me of the impact his ER had on me. I thought that there could be no one but Paul who could sing that song. After all, it was a solo work of Paul's and he sang it so beautfifully and dramatically.

But David made that song soar even more. He used that "primal scream" to make us feel evern more anguished at "all the lonely people, where do they all come from."

When David reaches deep in, takes that breath and lets go with those gut wrenching peak notes, there is just noone out there now except him who does that.

In the CBTM vid, just before the escalator scene, when he actually bends forward and down to get physically ready to belt "come back to me," he produces that primal scream par excellance.

Ms Darcy - your analysis of Permanent is beautiful. I would like to add my two cents (of course) about my favorite arrangement of Permanent, which is the live one David did on Idol. First, Andy's delicate use of the piano rather than the electronic keyboard evokes the image of teardrops. When the second verse becomes introspective lyrically (Adam now referred to in 3rd person), Dave's emotions deepen, and Andy follows suit by playing a bit thicker and in a lower octave. And when the full band enters? OMG - David's in the depths of grief - listen to that prominent bass line of Joey's and the crashing stabbing pangs of Kyle's cymbals. David lets it all out in that cry of anguish, and then its back to the gentle unending grief - simple piano and quiet voice. Great, just great.

ETA: Because I can't stop myself. These arrangements, where the listener is taken from point A to point B to point C, seem so rare compared to the repetitive riff-based songs which are so popular right now. Its a big reason I feel so passionate about David's music - his arrangements are like mini dramas.

Cimorene, this:

Maybe some of my understanding of this is a reaction to the primal scream found in all of these songs (although maybe not DIYA); certainly it provokes a similar response among them all.

Is, in my opinion, very present in DIYA...because David changed the words. The original was "I shoud've walked away", sung with no particular special emphasis. He only uses that line twice...the rest of the time it's I couldn't walk away, and the line is not only wailed, it's repeated with emphasis.

Downthread on June 22nd I posted about it after the first performance of the cover, how different the focus appears with 'couldn't' replacing 'should've'. It changes the leit motif of the whole song, IMO. "and now the music matches the anger and confusion of the words, it didn't before...."

Also, could that other sound that David emulated early in his singing career that you were trying to think of be Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam? We know Adam gave him Pearl Jam's "Ten" and that he loves the record, also, he sang both Chris Cornell's and Eddie Vedder's parts in "Hunger Strike".

♫♪♫
--
-Incipit9 - Irrationally 0sup2;

"Expect the Unexpected." tm WTF!Cook

Ms. Darcy, thank you for that description of the relationship between the music & lyrics of Permanent. I think you've actually hit on one of the more brilliant things I've found David does with music -- specifically:

He is absolutely belting out most of those lyrics, holding nothing back, and even when the words are reassuring, that voice is absolutely drenched in the overwhelming anguish of impending loss, pain, helplessness.... For me, it's that contrast - those two completely different but equally heartfelt emotional messages, co-existing throughout the same song

I first picked up on this with his covers of Hello and Creep. Listen to the originals and they seem almost anemic compared to the DC versions. And yet -- the lyrics work with both the original manifestations of the songs, and with the raw, passionate versions DC has created. It's a different interpretation of the lyrics that I could only open my eyes to upon hearing such a radically different delivery. DIYA provokes a similar response, I think. And for a while I thought that quality was unique to his covers alone, but there you go pointing out how the lyrics to Permanent also work by presenting that very same dichotomy. LOL. Maybe some of my understanding of this is a reaction to the primal scream found in all of these songs (although maybe not DIYA); certainly it provokes a similar response among them all. I'd love to know if you see that with any of his other songs, though. I don't know if I could entirely divorce the interpretation I'm used to while reading the lyrics and listening to the music, myself.

What I really wonder about is what we'll see in the coming years in the way of covers of DC songs -- which I think will be inevitable, given time. It would be fascinating to hear Permanent done, say, in a more subtle, lullaby-like style, for instance, given that the lyrics do support that interpretation, as you said, Ms. D. -- although I suspect I'd have to drown out the little voice screaming "heresy!" in the back of my head through most of it. But I think that creating a workable arrangement of that song, or any other song to be "un-Cookified," as it were, would require someone with the same strengths as DC, musically, and that's not an easy thing to find -- sort of a Bizarro-Cook, if you will, who could reverse engineer all DC songs to fit his own musical style, which encompasses Lionel Ritchie, Radiohead, Mariah Carey, and Cutting Crew all at once. Easy, right?

Yak, I floved your post about Declaration. Stuff like that, exploring how the music correlates to and and expands on the lyrical themes, is fascinating to me. And it reminded me that back when Cimorene first started this thread, someone raised the question of what it is about Permanent that makes it so special; I was busy with RL at the time and never got around to posting my thoughts then so I'm going to jump in now.

DC has called Permanent a lullaby for his brother; a lullaby, meant to convey comfort, rest, reassurance, peace. The instrumentation throughout, I think, fits that description: simple strings and piano, it's delicate, quiet, almost unobtrusive - by itself it could almost lull you to sleep. The lyrics, too, ultimately convey a message of reassurance: "Despite your worries, you can rest your head - I'm permanent."

But then we have that voice. And the dynamic and vocal choices he makes are far from what you'd expect in a lulllaby. The first verse is relatively quiet, but still not the hushed, honeyed tone and sweet falsetto we hear in, say, the opening of Avalanche. There's already a rasp there and a quaver that conveys doubt and uncertainty. And then he hits the chorus, and there's nothing quiet or soothing about it. He is absolutely belting out most of those lyrics, holding nothing back, and even when the words are reassuring, that voice is absolutely drenched in the overwhelming anguish of impending loss, pain, helplessness. The first time I heard it I felt like he was standing inches away from me, or singing directly into my brain; it's gut-wrenching.

For me, it's that contrast - those two completely different but equally heartfelt emotional messages, co-existing throughout the same song - that makes Permanent so unique. It really is an amazing piece of work and I don't think I've ever heard anything quite like it, or ever will again.

--
Declaration Tour iTunes artwork
Snark For The Cure

Ugh, ugh, ugh... another drive by with no real time to read or post, and I see y'all are talking about vocal range and such, stuff I actually know about. Kids home for the summer is seriously cramping my online style. So busy! I'm around on twitter more than anywhere else right now because, well, it's fast. Find me, same user name.

Anyway, new Matt Nathanson blog on his myspace, in which he talks briefly about his songwriting process. http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=6090232... Wow, that was ugly. Sorry. Maybe in the fall I'll have time to learn the thingies to fix that.

Also been reading the Philip Norman bio of John Lennon. I't's taking me forever, I think I'll be taking that book to my grave. First of all, I recommend it, despite the fact that it is kicking my ass, because, well lets just say I see a lot of parallels in the chapters regarding the early times of the band. One bit talked about John's songwriting process, and apparently he usually wrote the words then constructed his chord progression, no melody. The melody came last, and often that was a major place for collaboration. It also sounds like he collaborated almost as much with George Martin (their classical musically trained producer) as he did with Paul.

Oh, and when the Beatles toured? Their shows were *30* minutes. Thirty. Three-zero.

--
Karen

Cimorene, thanks so much for explaining. I remember growing up that High C was the Holy Grail for singers. It must be a (relatively) more recent development to go into the "whistle register".
Regarding Axiom songs, I always felt David was trying to channel his inner James Hetfield (Metallica). Since they were one of the ultimate rock bands of the 90s, it makes sense to me (YMMV)!

All right, I bothered to look it up...

Regarding Mariah Carey, wikipedia quotes an EW interview in which she states "''I'm an alto with a five-octave range,'' she says, ''and then there's my whisper register.''
Um, I think she means whistle register, but I won't get into that.

In any case, that would mean that, given that (per wikipedia again) that register tends to start above high C (C6), it could add another 2, 3, or 4 octaves. The world record for highest note hit is a G10, but Carey does not hold that record and I don't know how close she gets. Either way it would be entirely possible for her to have an 8- or even 9-octave range. I highly doubt she's got a 10-11 octave range, though. But yeah, impressive.

Again, this just makes me wonder about DC and just how high he can go... obviously not the whistle register, but that falsetto has got to go higher than what we've heard. And on the other end, his Axium songs have tended to sound like he was just singing in his lower register (i.e., chest voice), but I don't know if it's significantly lower than what we've already heard more recently... and in any case part of that may just have been the tone of his voice, as he sounded like he was mimicking some other bands popular at the time in some ways (can't think of who exactly and it's been bugging me for some time now... I blame my late immersion into rock music) and in any case he's basically admitted that for a long time he was trying to sound like other people and not himself.

As for me? Well, apparently I do go into the whistle register for about 5 notes, which is pretty much the only way I can hit high C. Who knew? Smiling

SybilT's avi (thud) inspires me to share how much I love, love love Declaration and have a flicker of hope remaining that it will get released as a single. The lyrics and the music are perfect complements to each other. Its so brash, bold and honest and such a straightforward communication between David and us, the listeners. I love how it starts relatively quietly, as if sharing something intimate, then the drums start beating underneath like a heart beat - look out! he's ready to burst! - and the fierce bravado and release of "Its my DEC-laration!" Even the clapping interlude in live performances gives us the chance to respond back (with approval, of course - Yes! Yes! Yes!). The octave jump between bridge and chorus (which runs thru a lot of the DCTR songs) seems particularly effective here, almost like he shared too much (will I ever be enough?) and needs to pull back. But he believes it heart and soul and up it builds again.

(I'm doing this from memory since d*mned work firewall is the instrument of the devil as it refuses to play music.)

SybilT - you're right about the full-size pic - it stopped me in my tracks,especially the cheek bones.

Since this is about the music, I will stop there. I could wirte pages about that pic.

Squirrelly, I'm impressed! An F above high C? Were you trained in opera? You must have had years of training along with a God-given talent.
On a side note, can anyone explain to me the statements about Mariah Carey's range? I've heard something to the effect that she has a 10-11 octave range. Now, I only took 5 years of piano as a child, but the skeptic in me finds it hard to believe she could hit the full spectrum of notes on a piano. Can someone enlighten me? Thanks!

Squirrellygirl (not verified):

Hi Cimone--BTW, I LOVE THIS THREAD!
"it is more of a high-pitched operatic type of sound, as best as I can describe. Is that what whistle notes are? They do have a bit of that whistling quality, but I could be making that up.--Cimone"

Yes, I was referring to the notes above high C where they will acquire that whisle sound, similar to Mariah Carey's high notes. I actually forget how to hit these now.

Anyway, I've lost at least a good octave or two, but I have acquired an octave or two in my lower register (which can sound kind of strange; I only use when necessary, but I CAN hit those low notes). Anyway, I suspect smoking over the years may have stolen some of my voice, but not all of it. Thank God I can still sing some. Anyway,

I HAD a huge vocal range (F above high C), but I am still thankful I have what I have. I haven't actually measured my range lately in octaves. I can only sing one of the Carpenters songs now (ha ha), the other songs are a wee bit high for me. BUT, I sang "Lithium" by Nirvanna and rocked out Karaoke, except I'm still hoarse from it (I don't know HOW David does it--when he sang "Declaration" at the Derby, I thought he was going to blow his lungs out, but he just keeps going, like one of those battery-operated bunnies! Love DAVID!

Regarding harmonics, I tend to agree with YaminaC, at least in part. Manipulation in the throat somewhere regarding conduction of air--sounds reasonable...maybe I'm wrong...who knows for sure?

--
Squirrellygirl

The more I read about producing vocal harmonics (and I've been doing an obscene amount of it) is that a sung pitch produces a normal patttern of harmonics which blends together and the ear hears the just the fundamental note. When you hear one dominant overtone as well as the fundamental note, the singer has made some sort of physical constriction that suppresses or weakens the other harmonic frequencies in the natural pattern, making one harmonic more dominant and heard separately. Maybe its the scrunchy face on high notes that produces this phenomenon?

Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - 19:56
YaminaC:

This thread has become my new obsession - mind if I am philosophical for a moment? I imagine a teenaged David hating his head and upset that his muscles just don't allow him to be fast as he'd like. These very things help make him the great singer he is. That which made him different made him special.

I love this comment. Making silk purses out of sow's ears. Make lemonade out of lemons. To think that the very things one would "hate" about oneself could be actually your gift, if you could only figure it out.

Another thing I noticed is that he has a very large throat. Some people have made fun of it as if it were a double chin, but it believe it is part of his singing muscles, creating a large resonant cavity like a bull-frog. I really think that David is one of the greatest singers of this era.

About how David learned to sing, in an interview he said that growing up he was a great mimic in singing, and then (after Axium?) he started finding his own voice (not exact quote). It could be that being a mimic is a great way to unconsciously train one's voice. In order to mimic something you have to experiment with different techniques to change your voice around. He has his own voice now, but he is able to make it rough and edgy, clean and sweet, control his vibrato, produce harmonics etc. Just experimenting with a lot of different styles of singing probably helped him to be able to do these different things. Not in an intellectual or "trained" way, but by direct experimentation and just doing it.

Even if the people he mimicked did not use the same techniques or sounds, by experimenting with your voice you are apt to discover better things that are off-shoots of what you were really after. I am sure David does not think "raise your pallet" or whatever, but he knows what feels right.

I also love the harmonics in his voice. It would be very interesting for someone to test the wavelengths his voice produces during different effects. What happens in his "throat singing" or when he hits that resonant sweet spot during many of his long notes.

Post-hoing to check out a new avi.

ETA: I flipped for the full size picture, but I think the avi is too small to do justice to the pretty. What do you think?

I promise my next post will be about the music.

--
Professor T holds the Hello Chair in Arm Porn Studies at WTFU

Now if only I could find a reason for my big rear end. - yamina

maybe it's to make the rest of us with big rear ends feel welcome!

linda

I used to could do a scream so high pitched that it sounded like a whistle. When I discovered I could do this as a kid, I would put my pinky fingers in my mouth like people do when they whistle and make people think my scream was a whistle. I haven't tried it in years for fear of hurting my vocal cords.

As a singer I have experienced a harmonic overtone when singing in a group. I used to sing with a group of about 8 women and on some of the songs we sang, the haromnies were so tight and our voices blended so well, you could hear a harmonic overtone an octive above what we where singing. Until Dave sang that note on STTL, that was the only time I had heard one.

I would love to have someone interview him about his voice.

--
“I’m learning to be self-sufficient with food.” (tm Dave)
Has he mastered Bacon, yet? Hopefully he won't set the Teal Drapes on fire by accident.

squirrellygirl - yes, I have heard that "sing from the top of your head" advice, too.

Perhaps these harmonics also account for the beauty of his speaking voice. When he finally does start acting, I think the wider public will be in for a huge delight, and classify his voice along with such greats as Richard Burton.

Welcome SybilT! I look forward to your joining us in whatever we're talking about (even if you just join me in being confused over the guitar posts -- we pianists need to stick together) when you've caught up. Smiling

Buenas noches, amigas y amigos. Taking a vacay from equine cadaver abuse and thought I'd check this place out. I have some musical fluency -- 5 years of piano study as a kid, and 6 years of piano study as an adult. Plus two years of violin in middle school (no cute cellist involved).

I'm gonna read back, so I'll be lurking for a while. Thanks for the piano music for Permanent -- I'm going to try to learn it!

--
Professor T holds the Hello Chair in Arm Porn Studies at WTFU

This thread has become my new obsession - mind if I am philosophical for a moment? I imagine a teenaged David hating his head and upset that his muscles just don't allow him to be fast as he'd like. These very things help make him the great singer he is. That which made him different made him special. Now if only I could find a reason for my big rear end.

No worries, squirrellygirl... apparently one of the characteristics of this thread is that sometimes it drags when no one says anything... and sometimes there's such a flurry of posts that it's hard to keep up. At least it seems that way to me *smile*.

As for regaining "lost" notes... um.... practice gradually? OK, I'll leave the half-@ssed guessing alone now and hope someone else can reply more intelligently. And do you mind clarifying what whistle notes are? I've never had any vocal training, but as I mentioned downthread -- I have approximately a 2 1/2-octave range, and was only first able to hit a high-C when I was in college. I just tried singing a scale now, and although I don't get nearly as much practice as I once did, it seems that once I get to the G below high C, the notes (which are already in head voice) are less singable, in a sense, as I don't think I've ever been capable of singing actual words at those pitches.... it is more of a high-pitched operatic type of sound, as best as I can describe. Is that what whistle notes are? They do have a bit of that whistling quality, but I could be making that up.

And MsDarcy, thanks for clarifying -- although as you implied, no formal vocal training does not mean no training whatsoever. Yeah. Waiting for that call from management to conduct my interview any day now. Eye-wink

YaminaC While I dig the idea that David is participating in Tibetan throat singing (hee - I am a Himalayan Yak after all), what I believe is happening is David raises his palate (the upper back of the throat) and flattens out his tongue, creating an optimum amount of space to resonate. The tone rings through his big ole head (said affectionately) without getting pushed into his teeny nose. The sound waves aren't blocked.

Yak, if only I had found you earlier! I can't believe you are actually talking about head cavities and the way sounds resonate in the Massive Alien Skull (also said affectionately). I have been wondering for at least a year whether the unusual size and shape of his head (and as someone who has tried to photoshop him for kicks into various hats, helmets, borg collectives etc., I can testify that it is very unusual) is a key component of his awesome singing voice; I even did some cursory research but couldn't find anything very informative so I felt stupid asking about it. And now here it is, right out in the open.

Have I told you all lately that I love this thread?

Cimorene, David has said he's had no formal voice lessons, which I took to mean one-on-one lessons with an instructor. As you say, he obviously had some training on AI and in musical theater.

--
Declaration Tour iTunes artwork
Snark For The Cure

Squirrellygirl (not verified):

I remember that I had a music teacher tell me to sing from the top of my head (not sure that he put it just that way, but it was something like that.), plus the correct breathing from the diaphram, etc. allowing for more space (for the sound to resonate), and projection of the voice will always give you more to work with, and give you opportunities to make changes, and practicing and playing with it will make you sound like David Cook, I guess.

I can't remember what it was that I did to be able to sing those high whistle notes when I was a kid, so it's hard for me to remember how I did it.

Does anyone know if there is a way to get back high notes that you've lost from lack of use of singing voice? That's what I would like to know...anyone?

--
Squirrellygirl

Squirrellygirl (not verified):

I had several different posts and was talking about harmony and harmonics. I wasn't very clear on my post that I had changed subjects. Sorry 'bout that, Cimorene. I do that sometimes. On the one post I was just talking about the article regarding using those techniques.

--
Squirrellygirl

United States

?